Focus of Professional Development on Teachers’ Felt Needs: A Paradigm Shift in Policy
A professional development that is often mandated is exclusionary, less motivating, and provides teachers with little or no improvement in their profe.
- Pub. date: June 15, 2022
- Pages: 63-75
- 343 Downloads
- 580 Views
- 0 Citations
A professional development that is often mandated is exclusionary, less motivating, and provides teachers with little or no improvement in their professional practice as well as student achievement. This necessitates a fundamental change in policy from prescribing professional development to addressing teachers’ self-identified felt needs. Hitherto, teachers are generally disenfranchised from specifying their felt needs for development, thus they feel uninterested, or enthusiastic to attend professional development programs that are prescribed for them by school leaders. When they do or are compelled to attend, they tend to be less attentive and are often indulged in reading newspapers, grading students’ test papers, texting, playing video games, or simply doing something unrelated to the professional development. This practice stifles teachers’ professional growth and student learning, hence it must not be allowed to continue unabated. Through a qualitative case study research design, using survey, interviews, and focus groups, this research brought to the fore, the debilitating effects of the current practice. Analysis of data yielded four major themes: choice, motivation, effectiveness, and satisfaction. The study proposed a paradigm shift in policy from mandating to granting teachers the autonomy to identify their own real or felt needs for professional development. Implications for practice, leadership, policy, and further research were also discussed.
felt needs leadership prescribed needs professional development student achievement teachers
Keywords: Felt needs, leadership, prescribed needs, professional development, student achievement, teachers.
0
References
Antley, T. (2020, July 16). What is professional development and why is it important? WebCE. https://bit.ly/3MgCMBR
Blandford, S. (2000). Managing professional development in schools. Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carroll, T. (2009). The next generation of learning teams. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(2), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909100203
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2013). Quantitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017, June 5). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
Department for Education and Skills. (2001a). Good value CPD: A code of practice for providers of professional development for teachers. Stationery Office.
Department for Education and Skills. (2001b). Learning and teaching: A strategy for professional development. Stationery Office.
Department for Education and Skills. (2001c). Teachers’ standards framework: Helping you develop. Stationery Office.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., Many, T. W., & Mattos, M. (2016). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Solution Tree Press.
Easton, L. B. (2008). From professional development to professional learning, Phi Delta Kappan, 89(10), 755-761. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170808901014
Gates, B., & Gates, M. (2014). Teachers know best: Teachers’ views on professional development. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Gupta, K. (2007). A practical guide to needs assessment (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin.
Husby, V. R. (2005). Individualizing professional development: A framework for meeting school and district goals. Corwin/Sage.
Karadimou, M., & Tsioumis, K. (2021). Willingness to communicate and collaborate: The key role of educational leadership in primary education. European Journal of Educational Management, 4(2), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.4.2.141
Kaufman, R. A., & English, F. W. (1979). Needs assessment: Concept and application. Educational Technology Publication.
King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 257–270). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280119.n21
Klan, T. (2017, November 13). How to create a cost-effective PD program that impresses. eSchool News. https://bit.ly/3LhWyeT
Koybasi, T., Ugurlu, C. T., & Baki, A. (2017). The Factors that influence bureaucracy and professionalism in schools: A grounded theory study. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(8), 196-207.
Laton, L. (2015, August 4). Study: Billions of dollars in annual teacher training is largely a waste. Washington Post. https://wapo.st/3a57Dmz
Learning Forward. (2015). 2011 Standards. https://bit.ly/3Nfqrh7
Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (2014). Teachers as professionals: Evolving definitions of staff development. In L. E. Martin, S. Kragler, D. J. Onatroche, & K. Bauserman (Eds.). Handbook of professional development in education: Successful models and practices, preK-12. The Guilford Press.
Liu, S., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2014). Teachers' motivation for entering the teaching profession and their job satisfaction: A cross-cultural comparison of China and other countries. Dordrecht, 17, 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9155-5
Mak, G. C. L. (2003). The professionalization of Hong Kong teachers: Dilemma between technical rationality and individual autonomy. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4, 170-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025359
Marcinek, A. (2015, June 17). Professional learning opportunities and the teachers they create. Edutopia. https://edut.to/3wwHZib
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). Longman.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Pearson.
Moir, E. (2013, May 23). Evolving from professional development to professional learning. EdSource. https://bit.ly/3woGWRg
National Education Association. (2002). Professional development. Author. http://www.nea.org/home/30998.htm
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M.; White, D. E.; Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The supervising truth about what motivates us. Riverhead Books.
Rhodes, C., Stokes, M., & Hampton, G. (2004). A practical guide to mentoring, coaching and peer-networking: Teacher professional development in schools and colleges. Routledge Falmer.
Scherff, L. (2018, January 4). Distinguishing professional learning from professional development. Regional Educational Laboratory (REL). https://bit.ly/3LlfYPU
Sehrawat, J. (2014). Teacher autonomy: Key to teaching success. Bhartiyam International Journal of Education & Research, 4(1), 1-8. https://bit.ly/3wdWqsp
Stegman, B. (2020, July 16). Personalized development from home. Edutopia. https://edut.to/3LaptBu
Theuma, J. (2012, May 3). Should teachers be paid to attend teacher training sessions? Oxford University Press, ELT. https://bit.ly/3l8Xyr7
Tichenor, M. S., & Heins, E. (2000). Study groups: An inquiry-based approach to improving schools. Clearing House, 73(6), 316-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650009599434
Zepeda, S. J. (2012). Professional development: What works. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315854878