logo logo European Journal of Educational Management

EUJEM is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Research Article

The Relationship Between Principals’ Leadership Practices and Students’ Learning Outcomes From a Distributed Perspective

Daniel Jambo Ghirmai

There is little empirical evidence that convinces the effectiveness of distributed leadership in contemporary educational research. Thus, many disting.

T

There is little empirical evidence that convinces the effectiveness of distributed leadership in contemporary educational research. Thus, many distinguished scholars suggest its’ statistical examination. Considering this need, the primary purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of principals’ distributed leadership practices on students’ learning outcomes at Technical and Vocational Education Training schools in Eritrea. The study was conducted based on quantitative design and applied structural equation modelling. A sample of six hundred and three students was employed. The researcher developed the structural equation model to test a model that hypothesized the relationship between the major variables using path analysis. The study results demonstrate that the principals’ distributed leadership practice has a direct and significant (.883, p<.001) effect on students’ learning outcomes keeping other things constant. The strongest predictor of students’ learning outcomes was capacity building, given it has the largest path coefficient (β=.346). Moreover, findings show gender disparity among the respondents and in terms of turnout rate; nevertheless, it was not statistically significant (p<.001). One of the study’s contributions is that it developed and assessed the validity of the principals’ distributed leadership practice scale for Eritrea’s TVET schools through CFA model. The study offered basic evidence that distributed type of leadership is a significant predictor of learning outcomes by exploring six factors of leadership practices, which shows a promising area for practice and future studies.

Keywords: Distributed leadership, learning outcomes, principal practice.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
181
Download
296
Citations
Crossref
0

References

Beswick, A., & Clarke, S. (2018). Network principals in Western Australia: An examination of their influence and strategies. Issues in Educational Research, 28(3), 545-559. http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/beswick.pdf

Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2012). Distributed leadership in action. Leading high performing leadership teams in English schools. School Leadership and Management, 32(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.642354

Bush, T., & Ng, A. Y. M. (2019). Distributed leadership and the Malaysia Education Blueprint: From prescription to partial school-based enactment in a highly centralised context. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(3), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2018-0206

Chen, D., Ning, B., & Bos, W. (2020). Relationship between principal leadership and students’ mathematics achievement: a comparative study between Germany and Chinese Taipei, Asia Pacific Journal of Education 42(2), 228-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1816899

Chrispeels, J. H. (2004). Learning to lead together: The Promise and Challenge of Sharing Leadership. Sage.

Clifford, M., Behrstock - Sherratt, E., & Fetters, J. (2012). The ripple effect: A synthesis of research on principal influence to inform performance evaluation design. American Institutes for Research.

Copland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 375-395. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025004375

Cross, E., Dobson, M., Walker, R., & Lowe, G. (2022). Leading for quality in Western Australian early childhood services: An emerging framework. Issues in Educational Research, 32(4), 1321-1341. http://www.iier.org.au/iier32/cross.pdf

Dampson, D. G., Havor, F. M., & Laryea, P. (2018). Distributed leadership an instrument for school improvement: The study of public senior high schools in Ghana. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 5(2), 79-85. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2018.52.79.85

Day, C., & Sammons, P. (2016). Successful school leadership. Education Development Trust.

Diamond, J. B., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). School leadership and management from a distributed perspective: A 2016 retrospective and prospective. Management in Education, 30(4), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616665938

Donaldson, G. A. (2006). Cultivation leadership in schools: Connecting people, purpose, and practice (2nd ed.). Teacher College Press.

Ghirmai, D. J., & Hongde, L. (2023). Exploring the effects of principals’ distributed leadership practices on learners’ learning achievement as mediated by teachers’ commitment. South African Journal of Education, 43(1), Article 2112. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n1a2112.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 266-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2018-0665

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.

Hargraves, A., & Fink, D. (2012). Sustainable leadership: John Wiley & Sons.

Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: developing tomorrow’s leaders. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203607909

Harris, A. (2011). Distributed leadership: implication for the role of principal. Journal of Management Development, 31(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711211190961

Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 41(5), 545-554. http://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635

Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2010). Testing a longitudinal model of distributed leadership effects on school improvement. Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 867-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.013

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hulpia, H., & Devos, G. (2009). Exploring the link between distributed leadership & job satisfaction of school leaders. Educational Studies, 35(2), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690802648739

Jambo, D., & Hongde, L. (2020). The effect of principal’s distributed leadership practice on students’ academic achievement: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 189-198. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p189

Jäppinen, A.-K., & Sarja, A. (2012). Distributed pedagogical leadership and generative dialogue in educational nodes. Management in Education, 26(2), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020611429983

Kahn, M. A. A., & Sobani, Z. A. (2012). Influence of gender and ethnicity on problem-based learning. Journal of Pakistan Medical Students, 2(3), 122-125.

Khine, M. S. (Ed.). (2013). Application of structural equation modeling in educational research and practice. Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-332-4 

Klar, H. W., Huggins, K. S., Hammonds, H. L., & Buskey, F. C. (2016). Fostering the capacity for distributed leadership: a post-heroic approach to leading school improvement. International Journal of Leadership on Education, 19(2), 111-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1005028

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford.

Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: effects on students, teachers, and classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829

Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research; How leadership influences students learning. The Wallace Foundation. https://bit.ly/3v76RQI

Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (Eds.). (2009). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. Routledge.

Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N., & Yashkina, A. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 37-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760601091267

Lumby, J. (2016). Distributed leadership as fashion or fad. Management in Education, 30(4), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616665065

Mason, C. H., & Perreault, W. D. (1991). Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 268-280. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172863

Mayrowetz, D. (2008). Making sense of distributed leadership: Exploring the multiple usages of the conception the field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(43), 424-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07309480

Miller, P. (2015). Leading Remotely. Exploring the experience of principals in rural and remote school communities in Jamaica. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 11(1), 35-53.

Mulford, B., & Silins, H. (2003). Leadership for organizational learning and improved student outcomes-what Do We Know? Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(2), 175-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640302041

Pascarella, E. T., Wolniak, G., Seifert, T., Cruce, T. A., & Blaich, C. F. (2005). Liberal arts colleges and liberal arts education: New evidence of impacts. ASHE Higher Education Report, 31(3), 1-148. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.3103

Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership, Volume 2: Case studies on system leadership, OECD iLibrary. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264039551-en

Rieckhoff, B., & Larsen, C. (2012). The impact of professional development network on leadership development & school improvement goals. School-University Partnership, 5(1), 57-73.

Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2006). School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teachers’ beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(3), 798-822. https://doi.org/10.2307/20054196

Sibanda, L. (2018). Distributed leadership in three diverse public schools: Perception of deputy principals in Johannesburg. Issues in Educational Research, 28(3), 781-796. http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/sibanda.pdf

Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey – Bass.

Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M., & Pareja, A. S. (2007). Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal workday. Leadership and policy in schools, 6(1), 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760601091200

Tian, M. (2016). Distributed leadership in Finnish and Shanghai schools. Jyväskylä studies in education, Psychology and Social Research. https://bit.ly/3wkdIqt

Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence & future research focus. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 44(1), 146-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558576

Timperley, H. S. (2008). Distributed leadership to improve outcomes for students. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall & T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp. 197-222). Routledge.

Torrance, D. (2013). Distributed leadership: Still in the gift of the headteacher. Scottish Educational Review, 45(2), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1163/27730840-04502006

Tsakeni, M., Munje, P. N., & Jita, L. C. (2020). Instructional leadership sensemaking for science and maths in South African multi-deprived middle schools. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 345-364. http://www.iier.org.au/iier30/tsakeni.pdf

Tsu, G. C. S. (2019). A study of staff engagement in a dimension of distributed leadership, organizational commitment and, perception of autonomy in Singaporean primary schools [Doctoral dissertation, Southern Cross University]. Southern Cross University. https://bit.ly/42Ipreh

Wan, S. W.-Y., Law, E. H.-F., & Chan, K. K. (2018). Teachers’ perception of distributed leadership in Hong Kong primary schools. School Leadership and Management, 38(1), 102-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1371689

Yılmaz, A. İ., & Beycioğlu, K. (2017). Distributed leadership behaviors among elementary school teachers. International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning, 12(1), 41-61.

...