Abu-Alhija, F. N. (2007). Large-scale testing: Benefits and pitfalls. Studies in educational evaluation, 33(1), 50-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.01.005

Ananda, E., & Ashadi, A. (2021). High-stakes testing and English teachers' role as materials developers: Insights from vocational high schools. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 115-130. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.17518

Atar, H. Y., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Temel eğitimden ortaöğretime geçiş: Uygulamalar ve sonuçları [Transition from primary to secondary education: Practices and consequences]. Eğitime Bakış Dergisi, (40), 15-25. https://bit.ly/3YQmBnC

Atila, M. E., & Özeken, Ö. F. (2015). Temel eğitimden ortaöğretime geçiş sınavı: fen bilimleri öğretmenleri ne düşünüyor? [Examination for Transition from Primary Education to Secondary Education (TEOG): What Do Science Teachers Think About It?]. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty, 34(1), 124-140. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/188142

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Baidoo, I. E. (2024). Performance-based accountability: exploring Ghanaian teachers perception of the influence of large-scale testing on teaching and learning. Education Inquiry, 15(3), 333-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2022.2110673

Baker, E. L., Barton, P. E., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H. F., Linn, R. L., Ravitch, D., Rothstein, R., Shavelson, R. J., & Shepard, L. A. (2010, August 27). Problems with the Use of Student Test Scores to Evaluate Teachers. Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/publication/bp278/

Bakırcı, H., & Kırıcı, M. G. (2018). Temel eğitimden ortaöğretime geçiş sınavına ve bu sınavın kaldırılmasına yönelik fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin görüşleri [Science teachers’ views on the removal of the transition from primary to secondary education exam]. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education/Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 383-416. https://doi.org/10.23891/efdyyu.2018.73

Bergbauer, A. B., Hanushek, E., & Woessmann, L. (2018). Testing with accountability improves student achievement. VOXEU CEPR. https://bit.ly/3ytluj0

Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: the case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287-302, https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151

Berryhill, J., Linney, J. A., & Fromewick, J. (2009). The effects of education accountability on teachers: are policies too-stress provoking for their own good? International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 4(5), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2009v4n5a99

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

Brill, F., Grayson, H., Kuhn, L., & O’Donnell, S. (2018). What impact does accountability have on curriculum, standards and engagement in education? A literature review. National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER).

Burger, J. M., & Krueger, M. (2003). A balanced approach to high-stakes achievement testing: An analysis of the literature with policy implications. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 7, Article 4. https://bit.ly/4dNxsTN

Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 305-331. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024004305

Chung, P. J., & Chea, H. (2015). South Korea’s accountability policy system and national achievement test. In W. C. Smith (Ed.), The global testing culture: Shaping education policy, perceptions, and practice (p.249-260). Symposium Book.

Çetin, A., & Ünsal, S. (2019). Merkezi sınavların öğretmenler üzerinde sosyal, psikolojik etkisi ve öğretmenlerin öğretim programı uygulamalarına yansıması [Social, psychological effects of central examinations on teachers and their reflections on teachers' curriculum implementations]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education/Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(2), 304-323. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018040672

Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students at work. Teachers College Press.

Decker, D. M., & Bolt, S. E. (2008). Challenges and opportunities for promoting student achievement through large-scale assessment results: Research, reflections, and future directions. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508408314173

Education Reform Act. (1988). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/40/contents/enacted

Emler, T. E., Zhao, Y., Deng, J., Yin, D., & Wang, Y. (2019). Side effects of large-scale assessments in education. ECNU Review of Education, 2(3), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119878964

Erskine, J. L. (2014). It changes how teachers teach: How testing is corrupting our classrooms and student learning. Multicultural Education, 21, 38-40.

Gilbert, C. (2012). Towards a self-improving system: The role of school accountability. National College for School Leadership. https://bit.ly/3SC4fD0

Gonzalez, A., Peters, M. L., Orange, A., & Grigsby, B. (2017). The influence of high-stakes testing on teacher self-efficacy and job-related stress. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(4), 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1214237

Gök, G. (2018). Geniş ölçekli sınavların sosyal ve psikolojik etkilerine ilişkin paydaş görüşleri [The opinions of stakeholders concerning the social and psychological effects of large scale examinations ] [Master’s thesis, Akdeniz University]. Akdeniz University Dspace. https://bit.ly/3MaHAtM

Güler, M., Arslan, Z., & Çelik, D. (2019). 2018 Liselere giriş sınavına ilişkin matematik öğretmenlerinin görüşleri [Mathematics teachers' views on the 2018 entrance exam for high schools]. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education/Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 337-363. https://doi.org/10.23891/efdyyu.2019.128  

Gümüştekin, G. E., & Öztemiz, A. B. (2005). Örgütlerde stresin verimlilik ve performansla etkilesimi [Productivity and performance interaction with stress of organization]. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(1), 271-288. https://bit.ly/3WA5gwz

Hamilton, L. (2003). Chapter 2: Assessment as a policy tool. Review of Research in Education, 27(1), 25-68. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X027001025    

Hanushek, E. A., & Raymond, M. E. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 297-327. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20091  

Hargreaves, A. (2020). Large-scale assessments and their effects: The case of mid-stakes tests in Ontario. Journal of Educational Change, 21, 393-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09380-5

Jerrim, J., & Sims, S. (2022). School accountability and teacher stress: international evidence from the OECD TALIS study. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 34, 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09360-0

Kahraman, İ. (2014). Merkezi ortak sınav uygulamasının etkilerine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri [The effect of common ımplementatıon that related to teachers’ opınıon]. Munzur Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(4), 53-73. https://bit.ly/3MBLjkC

Kirkpatrick, R., & Zang, Y. (2011). The negative influences of exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: Backwash from classroom to child. Language testing in Asia, 1, Article 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-1-3-36

Klenowski, V. (2011). Assessment for learning in the accountability era: Queensland, Australia, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 78-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.003  

Klinger, D., DeLuca, C., & Miller, T. (2008). The evolving culture of large-scale assessments in Canadian education. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, (76), 1-34. https://bit.ly/46QPKBl

Klinger, D. A., & Rogers, W. T. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of large scale assessment programs within low-stakes accountability frameworks. International Journal of Testing, 11(2), 122-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2011.552748

Lingard, B., Sellar, S., & Lewis, S. (2017). Accountabilities in schools and school systems. Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.74

Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational researcher, 29(2), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029002004

Maroy, C., & Voisin, A. (2017). Think piece on accountability [Research Report]. HAL open science. https://bit.ly/46IdQ16

Merriam, S. B. (2023). Nitel arastirma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber [Qualitative research: A Guide to Design and Implementation] (Trans. S. Turan, F. K. Canbaz, M. Öz, E. Karadağ, D. Yılmaz, H. Özen, M. Yalçın, S. İşçi, Ö. Öztekin, E. Dinç, & S. Yüksel). Nobel. (Original work published 2009).

Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2008). Why has high-stakes testing so easily slipped into contemporary American life? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(9), 672-676. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170808900913

No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/1

O’Neill, O. (2013). Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 4-16, https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.764761

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). School autonomy and accountability: Are they related to student performance? https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9h362kcx9w-en

Özer Özkan, Y., & Acar Güvendir, M. (2018). Merkezi sınavların öğretmenler üzerindeki öğretimsel ve duyuşsal etkilerini belirlemeye yönelik öğretmen ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [Development of the teacher's scale that measures the instructional and affective influences of the central examinations on the teachers]. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education/İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 189-204. http://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.394383

Parcerisa, L., Fontdevila, C., & Verger, A. (2021). Understanding the PISA Influence on National Education Policies: A Focus on Policy Transfer Mechanisms. In S. Jornitz & A. Wilmers (Eds.), International perspectives on school settings, education policy and digital strategies. a transatlantic discourse in education research (pp. 182-194). Barbara Budrich Verlag. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1gbrzf4.14 

Parcerisa, L., Verger, A., Pagès, M., & Browes, N. (2022). Teacher autonomy in the age of performance-based accountability: A review based on teaching profession regulatory models (2017-2020). Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30(100), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.6204

Perryman, J., & Calvert, G. (2020). What motivates people to teach, and why do they leave? Accountability, performativity and teacher retention. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(1), 3-23, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1589417

Popham, W. J. (1999). Where large scale educational assessment is heading and why it shouldn't. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(3), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1999.tb00268.x

Popham, W. J. (2000). Big change questions. “Should large-scale assessment be used for accountability?” --answer: depends on the assessment, Silly! Journal of Educational Change, 1, 283-289. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010054525759

Rahman, K. A., Seraj, P. M. I., Hasan, M. K., Namaziandost, E., & Tilwani, S. A. (2021). Washback of assessment on English teaching-learning practice at secondary schools. Lang Test Asia, 11, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00129-2

Ravitch, D. (2011). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. Basic Books.

Sağır, M., & Mart, M. T. (2017). Temel eğitimden orta öğretime geçiş (TEOG) sistemine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri [Teachers' views on the transition from primary to secondary education (TEOG) system]. Eğitime Bakış, (40), 56-59. https://bit.ly/3SV0hWi

Stecher, B., Hamilton, L. S., & Gonzalez, G. (2003). Working smarter to leave no child behind. Rand Corporation.

Taşkın, G., & Aksoy, G. (2018). Öğrencilerin ve öğretmenlerinin teog sistemi görüşleri ışığında ortaöğretime geçiş sisteminden beklentileri [Students’ and teachers’ expectations from the transition to secondary education system in the light of TEOG system views of them]. International Journal of Active Learning, 3(1), 19-43. https://bit.ly/3M7nn8v

Verger, A., & Parcerisa, L. (2018). Test-based accountability and the rise of regulatory governance in education: A review of global drivers. In A. Wilkins & A. Olmedo (Eds), Education governance and social theory: Interdisciplinary approaches to research (pp. 139-158). Bloomsbury.

Verger, A., Parcerisa, L., & Fontdevila, C. (2019). The growth and spread of large-scale assessments and test-based accountabilities: a political sociology of global education reforms. Educational Review, 71(1), 5-30, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1522045

Worth, J., & Van den Brande, J. (2020, January 29). Teacher autonomy: How does it relate to job satisfaction and retention? National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER). https://bit.ly/3YStpRH

Yağar, F., & Dökme, S. (2018). Niteliksel arastirmalarin planlanmasi: arastirma sorulari, örneklem secimi, gecerlik ve güvenirlik [Planning of qualitative researches: research questions, samples, validity and reliability]. Gazi Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(3), 1-9. https://bit.ly/3WCOrBn

Yang, C., Luo, L., Vadillo, M. A., Yu, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 399-435. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000309

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (5th ed.). Seckin Publishing.